Posts Tagged NYSE

Expense Ratios Are Nonsense

One of those investment counselors says, ?I will take your money and make you a profit every year, but I have a very hefty fee. For every
dollar I make you I will charge you a dollar?.

?How much will you make for me??

He replies, ?Because I invest in the stock
market I am not sure what each year will be, but
I have a real time track record that I have
doubled my clients money every three years. If
you start with $10,000 you should have $20,000
three years from now.?

?In other words out of the $20,000 you make
with my money you get half? That seems like an
awful lot.?

Mr. Money Manager asks, ?Does it make any
difference how much I make if I can double your
money??

Here we are computing a 50% expense ratio.
Who cares as long as he doubles the money? When you
talk to brokers when buying mutual funds one of their
pet talking points is that a particular fund has
a very low expense ratio. Who cares? The only
thing that is important is the final return.

Does it make any difference if a fund has a
3.5% expense ratio or a 1% expense ratio if the
3% fund makes more money? Of course not.

This is part of the Wall Street mystique
designed to confuse clients. Whatever mutual
fund you choose it should be one that has the
highest return. When it is no longer going up it
should be switched to a better performing fund
that is why you should only buy no-load funds.
Full service brokerage companies do not want to
sell no-load funds.

Commissions are expenses, but brokers don?t
talk about that. Do NOT pay commission. Brokers
will tell you that load (commission) funds are
better than no-load funds. Not true. Get up and
walk away from that broker. He is lying. Be
careful of certain types of mutual funds that
will have several classes of the same fund some
of which have hidden commissions. Don?t be
afraid to ask. To be absolutely sure call the
mutual fund company. They all have toll free
numbers.

There is only one way to make sense out of
expenses and expense ratios and that is the
performance of the fund in relation to all other
funds. First eliminate commissions. All other
expenses are apportioned over the year. One
other nasty charge funds have started adding is
redemption fees. Most are 2% and run out for
long periods of time. These are added to
discourage selling; no other reason.

There is only one thing that distinguishes
a ?good? fund from any other. It is going up while
the investor owns it. If it doesn?t you should
not have it. When it starts down it should be
sold and this has nothing to do with expense
ratios.

There is only one reason to own any equity
and it has nothing to do with expenses. It must go
up.

Copyright 2006

Al Thomas\’ best selling book, \”If It Doesn\’t
Go Up, Don\’t Buy It!\” has helped thousands
of people make money and keep their profits
with his simple 2-step method. Read the first
chapter and receive his market letter for 3
months at no charge at
http://www.mutualfundmagic.com and discover why
he\’s the man that Wall Street does not want
you to know.

Writen By : Al Thomas

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Mutual Fund Categories

I have recently been contacted by a gentleman who has a large financial Internet web site devoted to mutual funds and he has asked me to act as an editor. He sent me a list of mutual funds and asked me to list them into 53 categories.

\”Gee, Ken, thanks for asking, but I only have two categories.\” He was baffled. \”What about Large Cap, Mid Cap, Small Cap, Sector, Index, Emerging Market, Value, Undervalued, Balanced, Closed End, etc. etc. funds? What about all those Wall Street \”professionals\” who say we should analyze our portfolios and put money into different funds?\”

The answer is very simple. Don\’t listen to those \”experts\”. The only expert is the bottom line.

My two categories are those that PERFORM and those that are NONPERFORMERS. How do I differentiate them? Again, a very simple test. The performers are beating the S

Tags: , , , , , ,

No Comments

Mutual Funds: The Modern Den Of Thieves!

Mutual funds were created with the idea that one person can specialize and manage the investments of a large pool of money from multiple investors. Before the great depression mutual funds were called investment pools and mutual fund managers were called pool operators. The bull market of the 1920?s created a time of economic prosperity akin to the 1990s. The conceptualization of the pyramid scheme occurred at this time as well.

Ironically, the pyramid scheme had been debunked in 1920 when Charles Ponzi was arrested for offering investors unsustainable returns on postal certificates. The investors lost all of their money in Ponzi?s elaborate con job for which his name became synonymous. He was reportedly making a killing buying the postal certificates in Europe at low price and selling them at high prices in the United States. Con jobs in general like the one perpetrated in the movie ?The Sting? with Robert Redford and Paul Newman were labeled ?Ponzi Schemes.? The public never saw through the investment pool concept as a new form of Ponzi scheme.

Investment pools eventually became thought of as a rip-off in the mind of the public. This is because becoming a pool operator was like having a license to steal. Instead of focusing on the interests of the public who had money in the ?fund? the pool operators would engage in risky investments because the money was not theirs. They would also pay themselves extremely large fees. It became very clear to the public that investment pools were a big-rip off in the aftermath of the stock market crash of 1929.

There was so much abuse by pool managers that the Security Exchange Commission (SEC) was formed in large part to stop these rip off artists. The SEC effectively shut down the more blatant con jobs. Then the securities industry came up with a fancy new name for investment pools to suck the public back in: ?Mutual Funds!?

If your 401(k) provider offers an indexed mutual fund then put your money into that. An indexed mutual fund uses a stock market index such as the S

Tags: , , , , , , ,

No Comments

The 401(K): How The Insider Has Stolen Your Retirement!

Mutual funds were moderately successful in creating a presence in the stock market until the advent of the investment retirement account and in particular the 401(k). Corporate insiders persuaded the federal government to allow for the 401(k) in lieu of offering employees the traditional pension. When this happened the employees lost the protection of a specialized financial manager who could manage both the return and the risk of the retirement money of the worker.

This forced employees who are supposed to specialize in their work area into the field financial management with no training whatsoever. The 401(k) effectively FORCES individuals into mutual funds that as I just mentioned were notorious at the turn of the last century for defrauding the public of its savings. Ironically, these same executives had at the time, and still have, their company department of corporate attorneys. These secret departments do nothing but invent new ways for corporate insiders to suck more money out of the firm in the form of perquisites, stock options, and golden parachutes. This is the ?new? form of executive stewardship over the shareholder value and employee retirement!

Why is this so tough on the employee? The 401(k) plans do not offer individual stocks only mutual funds. What a scam! Corporate executives have effectively forced you to place your retirement dollars with their cronies in the securities industry who manage these investment pools. If you could talk to someone in the 1920?s about this they would be shocked. Someone from back when these investment pools were actively fleecing the public would see this as a criminal act perpetrated by the US federal government, inside corporate executives, and mutual fund managers.

Does that mean the 401(k) is a bad deal? That depends. If your employer matches a percentage of your wages it may be a fair deal but you should only contribute only up to the matching limit. After contributing the maximum matching amount to your 401(k) then put the rest in a Roth IRA. If your 401(k) provider offers an indexed mutual fund then put your money into that. An indexed mutual fund uses a stock market index such as the S

Tags: , , , , , ,

No Comments

What The SEC Really Thinks About Mutual Funds!

Let?s go into the details of why non-indexed mutual funds are such a bad deal. When Arthur Levitt became the head of the Security Exchange Commission in 1993 he had to sell off all of his individual stocks so that people would not claim that he was doing any dirty inside dealing. He decided to put the cash from selling off his stock portfolio into mutual funds.

Mr. Levitt grew very angry when he tried to decipher how particular mutual funds divvied up their cash into specific stocks. He couldn?t make heads or tells from the fancy brochures of the mutual funds called prospectuses. He had been a major player in the stock brokerages for over 25 years at that point and knew that if he couldn?t understand the mutual fund?s prospectus then he knew public investors couldn?t either; it had to be a big scam to suck money out of the public.

In 1980 the US public invested $100 billion into the 500 mutual funds that existed at that time. By 1993 the public put $1.6 trillion into the more than 3,800 mutual funds that existed in that year; talk about growth! By the end of February 2003, at the bottom of the bear market there were 8,200 mutual funds and the public had pumped in $6.3 trillion dollars. Wow! That is a lot of money. What is important to note is that at least 40% of mutual fund money comes in from 401(k) retirement accounts. Today these mutual funds own about 20% of all publicly traded shares of stock. Mutual funds act like a herd of cows buying and selling the same stocks at the same time. This increases the wild price volatility swings in the stock market.

These funds are also sold and managed on pure hype, short term trading, and with key information withheld from the public. All of these factors I teach finance students and investors to avoid! The industry confuses investors by focusing on past performance, which should not be a factor to consider. Many mutual funds are able to cheat the public with excessive fees because investors don?t understand how these big costs destroy their profit. Mutual funds have no interest in educating investors because it is easier to hoodwink the ignorant!

Don?t put your trust in mutual funds unless they are fully indexed. Indexing means that the mutual fund simply uses a computer to buy and sell stocks in the mutual fund portfolio so as to mimic the composition of a major stock market index like the S

Tags: , , , , , ,

No Comments

Hedge Fund Advertising

Have you seen all those big full page ads for hedge funds in the Wall Street Journal, the Financial Times, Investors Business Daily? You
haven?t. Maybe they are being drowned out by the regular mutual funds who continually tell you how great they are.

Shucks! I forgot. Hedge funds are not
allowed to advertise. I wonder why. Maybe they think
that their potential customers are too dumb to
know that hedge funds are a poor investment.
Could be. The Securities and Exchange Commission
is trying to protect investors ? I think?

To be able to buy into a hedge fund the
smallest investor must have a net worth of
$1,000,000 and an income of more than $200,000
per year. Maybe the SEC doesn?t think these
folks are bright enough to know a good thing
when they see it.

There are other groups that are major
investors with the hedge funds. Literally billions
of dollars are invested by university endowments,
charitable trusts, state and corporate pension
plans. Could it be that they have a better
return than regular mutual funds? Naw! The media
would tell you wouldn?t they?

The media is there to report the facts. It
is hard to believe that just because a large
portion of their income is from advertising
revenues of mutual funds that they would be lax
about this.

If you were a fund manager and your fund
was under performing and it was reported in the
local paper, TV, or radio would you pay them to
carry your advertising? You sure would not want
to be compared with performance of a hedge fund.

What is it that makes the difference of a
standard mutual fund with a hedge fund? Why does
the smart money gravitate to them? One word.
Performance. A regular hedge fund manager is
paid on HOW MUCH money he has in his fund and
not on how much he makes for the investor. The
hedge fund manager is paid a percentage of the
PROFITS he makes for the investors. No profit
means no bonus so he better do the job or he
will be out of a job. Smart money moves. It
moves to where the profit is being made.

The SEC will not allow standard mutual fund
managers to be compensated in this manner. Their
claim is that it will be too dangerous for the
small investor. Hog wash! If a fund is losing
money the little guy should be selling his
current funds like the smart money and finding a
better performing fund. None of the media
recommend this to the little guy.

My guess is there are enough intelligent
fund managers who would like to be paid for
performance and would set up no-load funds to
attract investors. The SEC seems to think more
of the funds than they do of the smaller
investors.

It is a shame you can?t check the advertising
claims of standard mutual funds against the
returns of hedge funds.

Copyright 2005

Al Thomas\’ book, \”If It Doesn\’t Go Up, Don\’t Buy
It!\” has helped thousands of people make money
and keep their profits with his simple 2-step
method. Read the first chapter at
http://www.mutualfundmagic.com
and discover why he\’s the man that Wall Street
does not want you to know.

Copyright 2005

Writen By : Al Thomas

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Finding A Good Stock

One of the things people are always asking me is how can I find a good stock. The answer I give does not please them. I say, “You are not qualified to pick stock. You don’t know how so don’t try. Put your money in a no-load mutual fund that is going up”.

The next cry is, “I don’t want to buy mutual funds. What do I do?”
OK, so I’ll tell you. It is easy. You will have to do less than an hour of work. None of that Wall Street mythology about research which is all horse hockey. The way Wall Street does research is worthless. And don’t listen to any broker. Advice from a broker is a eulogy for your money.

They want you to look at the company prospectus. This document isn’t worth the paper it is printed on. It was not written for the investor; it was written to pass inspection by some Dilbert lawyer in Washington to see that it meets all the regulations. You can take a prospectus of a very good company and one of a company that has gone bankrupt and you will see they are almost identical. Throw them away.

Read the Annual Report. Another bit of smoke and mirrors. The title should tell you – Annual. Much of what is in it is a year old. Worthless. And let’s hope it doesn’t have a case of Enronitis.

Get a report from Morningstar. They know all about every financial statistic for a company that you can think of. You might even find out how many sugar lumps the CEO has in his coffee, but there is one thing you won’t learn. If you buy this company’s stock will it go up? What I am saying is that all the conventional wisdom methods of doing research are worthless. So what do you do?

On the Internet you can find a list of the best performing mutual funds. Go to www.smartmoney.com or www.yahoo/finance.com . There are other places also, but these 2 are very good. List the top 5 mutual funds (write down their symbols). Now go to www.bigcharts.com .
Put in the symbol for one of the funds. A chart will come up giving you a picture of the price performance of that fund. If it is going up at a 25-degree angle or more it means the fund manager is doing a good job of picking stocks. At the top of the chart picture there is a legend for Morningstar. Click on that. The new page will show near the bottom the major holdings of this fund. Again you need to get the symbols for his top 5 stocks and look at the chart picture for each one. If that stock is going up in a nice steady price over a period of time of 6 months or longer you have found a winner. Do this with several funds until you have found some stocks you like.

You have let a professional stock picker do all the work for you and now can piggyback his expertise at no cost. Please remember that when that stock turns down you want to sell it. You may be able to ride one up, but you can never tell when it will turn into another Enron. Always be ready to sell.

Al Thomas’ book, “If It Doesn’t Go Up, Don’t Buy
It!” has helped thousands of people make money
and keep their profits with his simple 2-step
method. Read the first chapter at
http://www.mutualfundmagic.com
and discover why he’s the man that Wall Street
does not want you to know.

Copyright 2005

Writen By : Al Thomas

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments