Posts Tagged settlement

Avoid Home Buying Blues At Closing

Buying a home is a stressful and emotional affair. You can avoid the home buying blues by keeping your cool at closing.

I?ve just come from a settlement table at which a friend bought a new condo. It?s beautiful, convenient and just what she wanted. However, at the settlement table she and a relative whom she clearly loves got into a tiff with each other. What should have been a happy occasion was almost spoiled. Thank heavens they got themselves together and the situation was saved, but arguments and hurt feelings are frequent at settlement tables and on moving day. It doesn?t have to be that way.

The Trauma of Change

Changing one?s home is right up there with the big changes in life ? birth, death, divorce, and retirement. Most of us recognize the trauma of the first three. Many of us recognize the need to prepare mentally and emotionally for retirement. Few of us realize how badly buying and moving into a new home frays our nerves and shortens our tempers. It can have serious consequences. I?ve seen deals blow up, and almost blow up, because of it. (Sometimes the protagonists are the buyer and seller.)

Mitigating Moves

There are a number of things you can do to ensure that the day you buy or sell your home is calm, sane and happy. Let?s consider some of them. Some are easy. Some harder. You?re apt to think of some which will be unique to you and your family.

First of all, simply realizing that these are flash points and discussing it with family members is a good starting point. There are many decisions to be made and much work to be done. Life is about to change for everyone who is a party to the process. It helps to just acknowledge that you?ll need to work together so that it?s a good experience for everyone in the end. Remember the expression, ?I need to take a deep breath and get my equilibrium back.? Clue in family members when you feel the tension rise.

Get a good night?s sleep the night before the settlement. Have a good, unrushed breakfast. Have someone you know well look after small children and pets until after settlement; you don?t need distractions during a large financial transaction.

At settlement, ask questions about anything you don?t understand. Use a quiet, neutral voice. Don?t sound like you are accusing someone of something. Simply ask for information and clarity. Don?t feel rushed. Take the time to understand. Many of the arguments I?ve seen at the settlement table happened because someone assumed something and didn?t ask about it. They just pitched into an irritated tirade. Not a good idea.

What if your questions turn up an unexpected and unacceptable answer? Let it be known that you expected it to be handled another way and why. Listen to any explanation calmly. Evaluate it. Does the other person have a valid point? How much difference does it make to you? Remember, it isn?t necessary to have everything exactly as you?d like in order to have the transaction go well for you. Keep the big picture in mind. You don?t have to be right about everything, nor do you have to win every point in order to be pleased with the final outcome.

Whether you call it settlement or closing, the final meeting will be stressful even if absolutely everything goes perfectly. Make sure you get through it by minimizing the stress.

Raynor James is with http://www.fsboamerica.org – FSBO homes for sale by owner. Visit our \”sell my home\” page at http://www.fsboamerica.org/seller.cfm to list homes for sale by owner. Visit http://www.fsboamerica.org/buyer.cfm to see homes for sale by owner.

Writen By : Raynor James

Tags: , , , , , , ,

No Comments

5 Questions To Ask If Considering Settlement Loans And Lawsuit Loans

Ever think about what you could potentially gain if you were to get more information about settlement loans and lawsuit loans. You it’s really being encouraged to do so before settling your claim for much less the true value of the claim. Obtaining such information may improve your entire life! Many people have actually done that. Unfortunately, very few individuals actually take this step toward making their dream a reality. Many lack the desire to sufficiently research the issue, assuming that it’s too complex. Therefore, it is nothing more than a dream to them.

Is the issue truly overly complex? Do the individuals actually have sufficient information to know how to begin such a query? Was the analysis balanced? Did they actually ask relevant questions? Before we let the negatives rule, the positives deserve a fair hearing. Let’s examine 5 questions that should be asked when considering settlement loans and lawsuit loans. Pay attention to those that ring true.

First, what are lawsuit loans and settlement loans? Sure, I certainly understand your confusion and realize that the insurance carrier will quickly make it appear as though it wants to settle your claim for a fair and equitable amount. However, the reality is that in most instances they won’t. I agree that the authors often appear very tempting. However, please consider that in the vast majority of instances are going to push very hard to convince you that you should just go away. In numerous instances, plaintiffs find themselves being demonized for even having filed a claim. Furthermore, consider that insurance carriers hire an insurance defense firm to represent the insurance company in almost every instance. (Yes, I realize that the attempt is to portray that the insurance carrier is representing the defendant. However, the truth is that the insurance carrier is clearly looking out for its own interests.) Insurance carriers spend millions of dollars every year on insurance defense attorneys. They aren’t there to help dole out funds to individuals who file claims against insurance carriers. In fact, many insurance carriers have full-time “in-house” attorneys.

Second, it is also very important to realize that, although the facts may be clear in the plaintiff’s mind, it is very likely that the defendant will have an entirely different perception of how the incident occurred. Unfortunately, many individuals fail to accept the fact that such a situation will very likely occur. In fact, this is a very common occurrence. The main reason for that would be the defendant will certainly be looking out for his/her interests. However, oftentimes we see life through our own prisms. Differences of opinion can and often do arise. The defendant is not having to deal with those expenses you incur due to their negligence. It is finally important for you to realize that the very defendants who are fighting against you, insisting that your claim should not be paid, have their own problems and are not the least bit concerned about whether you’re able to continue to maintain your mortgage payments, pay utility bills, put food on your table, etc.

Third, how high are the interest rates on lawsuit loans and settlement loans? Furthermore, how do I know whether the interest rates are fair? Although this may be confusing, it is very in important to realize that there are no interest rates when individuals obtain settlement funding. These charged within an individual obtained a lawsuit loan are referred to as risk fees. The risk fees are contingent on the inherent risks involved in your particular case. The higher the inherent risk, the higher the fee for obtaining settlement funding. It is important to realize that settlement funding is not truly a loan. If a settlement funding were a loan, it would be necessary for you to repay the money obtained, irrespective of the outcome of your case. Contrariwise, such funding is referred to as “non-recourse”. This simply means, if you not do not prevail in the underlying claim, you pay nothing!

Fourth, what if I lose my case? As previously indicated, this is a beauty as obtaining non-recourse funding. If you lose your case, have nothing to repay.

And fifth, what if the settlement obtained is less than the funding advanced? This scenario is unlikely. Companies that advance lawsuit loans and settlement loans will only provide funding up to 10% of the perceived value of the underlying claim. Therefore, those who obtain pre-settlement loans would rarely, if ever, obtain funding that is less than the settlement obtained in the case.

Once you’ve honestly consider the questions identified herein, and had an opportunity to think about them, you’ll notice that a top-notch case can be made in favor of obtaining settlement loans and lawsuit loans to assist you in obtaining the settlement you deserve.

Now what do you think? Isn’t it worth giving this some serious consideration? What if individuals could really obtain settlement loans and lawsuit loans and avoid having to accept the ridiculously low offers the insurance carriers makes?

If you happen to consider the foregoing questions and evaluate them, you will have to admit that a very compelling case can be made for starting analyzing the need to procure settlement loans and lawsuit loans.

Just think it over. Maybe, just maybe, you really, in all seriousness, should consider litigation funding.

Tags: , , , , , ,

No Comments

Lawsuit Loans: Getting Funded

Great! My case qualifies for a settlement loan. What does that mean? More importantly, of the cases that “qualify,” how many actually obtain settlement loans? What makes the difference?

The industry out of which lawsuit funding is spawned is quite intriguing. Since I’ve been involved with this industry, viewing it through the eyes of both an attorney and healthcare provider, one thing is unmistakably clear – the vast majority of cases that are submitted for pre-settlement loans get denied right out of the starting-gait! To what can this be attributed?

Unequivocally, the vast majority of individuals who seek settlement loans are unable to demonstrate that they’ve sustained any specific losses/injuries. For those individuals who are unable to demonstrate such losses/injuries, it is extremely unlikely that they will prevail in the underlying lawsuit. It would be virtually impossible for them to succeed in obtaining settlement loans.

The process of filing a lawsuit today is quite easy. Nonetheless, there is a vast distance between filing a lawsuit and prevailing in the lawsuit filed. Defendants are likely to disagree with your theory of the case. (If this weren’t so, it is unlikely that the current litigation would be a consideration. Furthermore, the insurances carrier’s coffers are found locked in the absence of persuasive evidence that their insureds are indeed liable for injuries/losses alleged.

To get funded, remember, it is your responsibility to accurately document the actual harm imposed and the defendant’s liability. Hence, the need, in almost all cases, to retain competent legal counsel.

Frequently, plaintiffs come to us requesting lawsuit loans in pro se cases. Such cases are those brought by plaintiffs without legal counsel. A key fact to bear in mind when pursuing settlement loans, “No attorney, no funding!” Most lawsuit funding entities are not sufficiently foolish to place hopes of prevailing in the litigation for which funding is sought on the acumen of a pro se litigant.

In Law, the following adage is frequently echoed: “The attorney who represents himself/herself has a fool for a client.” This is generally true for attorneys and almost certainly true for lay-plaintiffs vying against defendants, insurance company defense attorneys et al.

Those pursuing lawsuit funding must also be prepared to proffer expert opinions/testimony that clearly establishes a mechanism that would likely produce the injuries claimed. Illustrative of this point is a recent case filed with Legal Settlement Loans regarding “toxic mold.” The case is dead-in-the-water unless and until reputable expert testimony/opinion is proffered.

Success in obtaining settlement loan essentially relies on three key components: (1) the plaintiff must retain competent legal counsel; (2) it is wise to only submit claims for lawsuit loans for which injuries are clearly demonstrable; and (3) the plaintiff must be prepared to produce an expert who is both reputable and able to satisfactorily communicate the link between the alleged incident and the injuries arising from that incident. (Such testimony may be obtained either by depositions or written opinions, to name but a few methods.)

The vast majority of funding-entities offer virtually no guidance to those who seek settlement loans. However, litigation funding experts work very closely with their clients to assist them in finding the pre-settlement loans that are most applicable to the cases submitted. Additionally, these litigation funding experts will work closely with clients to assist them in finding the funding-entities that have the financing arrangements that are most desirable for the client’s needs. (Additionally, they will assist their clients in obtaining the funding as quickly as possible.)

Remember, it isn’t sufficient to have a case that “qualifies” for a lawsuit loan. As a plaintiff in need of financial assistance immediately, you want one that gets funded.

Tags: , , , , , ,

No Comments

Making Sense Of Debt Consolidation

A structured settlement annuity is often the alternative to lump sum settlements when resolving cases out of court. This involves an agreement for a predetermined amount of cash to be paid out to one party for a fixed length of time. These payments are also known as periodic payments.

Also known as periodic payments, these could be made for the duration of the life of the claimant. The payment can be in the form of equal installments or installments of varying amounts. Because these are long-term payments, it is important to get an assurance of the credentials of the annuity provider to ensure that it is capable of meeting the terms of the settlement.

The claimant’s monthly expenses, present age, extent of hazard in occupation and retirement plans are considered in determining the start date, duration and frequency of the payment. In some cases, the insurance company making the payment is allowed to transfer its obligation to a third party. All these should be specified in the settlement agreement.

Some of the issues involving the structured settlement annuity include payments losing their value over time due to inflation and the recipient’s financial situation changing. It is also possible that there will come a time when the recipient will need more money than he is receiving from the settlement. However, the structure of payments should not be altered once both parties have agreed on it, not if the payments are to remain tax-free.

People sell structure settlement payments for these and various other reasons. Whether selling in part or whole, the lump sum they will receive allows them to take charge of their finances. They can use it in making other investments such as real estate purchases or as capital for a business venture.

There are plenty of companies advertising on the Internet, offering to buy structured settlements. Past payment records and working relationships with insurance companies are good indicators of the company’s ability to get the sale approved quickly. A competent settlement purchaser should have a solid reputation in these two areas.

Being licensed, insured and bonded are other qualities to look for in a purchaser. This means that clients get their cash even if the structured settlement company goes out of business. Most of these companies also offer free consultations, which is a good way of getting to know a prospect better while getting free financial advice at the same time.

As with any major decision-making, it is essential to look into all possible options and weigh the pros and cons. For instance, a structured settlement annuity is beneficial for retirees or people with low earning ability, giving them a regular income without having to worry about managing it. People who sell structured settlement payments have more flexibility in terms of investment options since they have control of their own finances. However, this option makes sense only if they can manage their investment portfolio effectively.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Pros And Cons Of A Structured Settlement

As with just about everything, structured settlements have both advantages and disadvantages. One key advantage is the tax benefits associated with a properly set-up settlement. An appropriately set-up structured settlement could very well reduce the plaintiff?s tax obligations. In some cases the settlement could avoid taxes altogether.

Another advantage is that the structured settlement could also prevent a plaintiff from splurging all their money all at once. In this way, the structured settlement could be a sort of financial control. Instead of getting the money all at once and risking spending much of it on unnecessary or unwise transactions, a structured settlement?s periodic payments will help the plaintiff with paying for necessary costs before they spend the money on other things.

However, this advantage could very well be seen as a disadvantage to many. Some people want to make big purchases, such as a car or home, and may prefer a large one-time lump sum payment to periodic payments. Even if they do not have desires for expensive purchases, some people may just feel that they would do better if they were able to invest their money themselves.

Essentially, for those who might have a difficult time managing a large sum of money, structured settlements offer a simple and helpful way to avoid dissipating the cash recklessly. However, for claimants who are able to manage money well on their own, the periodic payments may be an annoyance.

http://www.structuredsettlementsdaily.com

Writen By : Jason Hahn

Tags: , ,

No Comments

Class Action Lawsuits

First of all, let me say that anyone who has been in any way hurt or injured by any other party and settled through a class action lawsuit, disregard this article. I am more interested in the little frivolous lawsuits that award pitiful amounts to offended parties who most likely had no idea they were offended.

There are habitual class action participators and then there are the lucky ones who find themselves on the receiving end of a check to settle a dispute they were most likely never aware of in the first place. And the best part is the size of the checks, often in amounts less than the stamps used to mail them. Nothing like getting a check for fourteen cents in the mail says L. Matthews, whose settlement check in the landmark case against American Express Centurion Bank just arrived.

Sometimes the amount isn?t the issue as much as the stipulations surrounding the acceptance of the settlement. In Los Angeles, a judge approved an agreement calling for Sony Pictures Entertainment to pay $1.5 million to settle a class-action lawsuit accusing the studio of citing a fake movie critic in ads for several films, an attorney said Tuesday.

Moviegoers who saw the films \”Vertical Limit,\” \”A Knight\’s Tale,\” \”The Animal,\” \”Hollow Man\” or \”The Patriot\” during their original theater runs must file a claim to be eligible for a $5 per ticket reimbursement, said lawyer Norman Blumenthal, who represented a group of filmgoers who sued Sony Pictures in 2001. What do they do when the 1.5 million runs out? You have to assume more than 300,000 tickets were sold between the four movies.

I have been awarded three ridiculous checks as settlement for things I wasn?t truly injured by. I am proud to say those checks; totaling $7.41 were not and never will be cashed. Cashing them would be condoning the practice, where consumers get the pittance, and the attorneys pushing the cases get the nice cars. Me? I?m hoping for a direct hit by a dominoes delivery driver.

Jason Rigler
\”Settlement Advocate\” and consultant for Prosperity Partners Customer Service Department.

Writen By : Jason M Rigler

Tags: ,

No Comments

The Cash Now Question

If you have ever been in a bind for cash you know the stress, the weight of not being able to pay your bills. In these desperate times, desperate measures are often taken. Expensive loans, overused credit cards, and a snowball of events quickly complicate your financial position. Once the collectors begin their relentless pursuit of your sanity, the road to financial prosperity seems a million miles away. On the scene arrives your hero, the ?Cash Now? guy.

The ?Cash Now? guy says he can buy your lawsuit settlement and give you a lump sum for it. Of course, you have to have a structured settlement; you have to be receiving annuity payments, on top of a myriad of other qualifications. So if you are a lawsuit winner with an annuity settlement, is it really as good as it seems? Can cash now ease your financial woes? Maybe, but maybe not, it all depends on your situation.

The formula is simple. Does solving your money problems today outweigh the price you pay to get an advance on your future annuity payments? For example, paying what equates to a one time 25% interest fee on $30,000 might be worth the price to save your home and avoid bankruptcy. If you are behind on credit cards, which charge you a ridiculous 24% interest rate, does it make sense then to take a lump sum option? The credit card rate is better than the discount you would pay. What if you had to give up $30,000 of your $75,000 lump sum due in 8 years? Will the $45,000 you get today make up for the 30k throw away?

Annuities and structured settlement suits were created and scheduled to meet the future needs of a recipient. The fee for accelerating those payments is exorbitant. Researching alternative options is a must, and at the end of the day, it is your sanity that makes the final argument. Is cash now an answer to your prayers? Probably not but, it is a choice on your list. And it?s time to get started on that list before your bills get the better of you.

Jason M. Rigler
National Marketing Director and Guru
JasonR@ppicash.com
Prosperity Partners
www.ppicash.com

Writen By : Jason Rigler

Tags: , , , , ,

No Comments